Jay-Z counterclaims a woman for a false rape

The legal issue involving Jay-Z is increasingly intrigued and complex for its alleged sexual abuse. With a counter -move, the rapper claims that the woman who accused him together with his lawyers consciously proceeded with the false affirmation that he and Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs had raped her when she was 13 years old.

The woman, anomimated but in the complaint indicated as Jane Doe in February withdrew the cause of rapper against the rapper, claiming that she and her lawyers consciously proceeded with a false complaint and that she falsified the story that Jay-Z and Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs had raped her when she was 13 years old, during an apterparty for MTV Video Music Awards of 2000.

The lawsuit, presented in Alabama, where the woman lives, quotes both the woman and her lawyers Tony Buzbee and David Fortney.

Jay-Z’s lawyers declared that the woman “admitted voluntarily and directly that the story publicly presented in court and world television was false and malicious”. The woman admitted in an interview with the NBC News that she had “made some mistakes” in her statements. He said that the father went to take it after the alleged aggression. He also claimed to have spoken with a musician present at the Fter Party that he was actually on the tour of elsewhere at that moment.

The new cause provides for a request for compensation in favor of Jay-Z for defamation against him and of a malicious accusation. It is said that the rapper has undergone damage to the reputation and that his company Roc Nation has lost more than 20 million dollars.

In a statement, Buzbee – the woman’s lawyer – said that the cause of Jay -Z has “no legal value”. He added that the quotes attributed to her in the new cause are “completely invented or have talked to someone who is not his client. This is only another attempt to intimidate and harass this poor woman, of whom we will deal with debt time. We will not intimidate from frivolous cases”.

Buzbee is the subject of a previous cause by Jay-Z, who last year accused the lawyer of asking for a “confidential mediation” equivalent to an extortion regarding the rape charges of Jane Doe. A judge rejected the request for extortion but allowed to proceed with the request for defamation, but no decision was made.

In a new sworn declaration, the woman said she was approached home in February by two people who claimed to be investigators who worked with the artist’s lawyer, and that they had refused to sign documents portraying her accusations. The woman added that she had withdrawn the original cause for fear of Jay-Z and her fans and for the probability that “I had to be publicly exposed and the subject of public attacks”.